ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics in Healthy Chinese and Caucasian Adults.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Korean red ginseng on deep capillary plexus parameters in diabetic retinopathy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.Journal of ginseng research · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of VF, OCT, and OCTA in Glaucoma: A Prospective Multi-Visit Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of ocular imaging biomarkers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Racial Variations in Retinal Oxygen Metabolic Biomarkers in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Pilot Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal analysis of retinal and choriocapillaris in patients with multiple sclerosis: a 3-year study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Variabilities in Retinal Hemodynamics Across the Menstrual Cycle in Healthy Women Identified Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe goal of the present study was to identify differences in retinal microvasculature between healthy Caucasians and healthy Asians in order to provide a better understanding of the variability between different ethnic groups.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 191 healthy Chinese and Caucasian participants were enrolled. They underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scans with Zeiss Cirrus HD-5000 Spectral-Domain with AngioPlex. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association of OCTA metrics with potential risk factors.
resultsWhereas participants in both groups are comparable in age and sex, Chinese participants had a longer axial length, higher spherical equivalent, higher intraocular pressure (
conclusionsThere are significant differences in the retinal vasculature between Caucasian and Asian eyes as measured using OCTA. This needs to be considered when developing normative databases. Whether such findings relate to inter-racial differences in the incidence of retinal vascular disease remains to be shown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.