ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
AI-Driven Thoracic X-ray Diagnostics: Transformative Transfer Learning for Clinical Validation in Pulmonary Radiography.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of an Offline CNN Framework Utilizing Multi-View Chest X-Rays for Screening 14 Co-Occurring Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: A Systematic Review from Nanomedicine to Neurology and Hepatology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of the ChatGPT artificial intelligence application in the diagnosis of spontaneous pneumothorax on chest radiograph interpretation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-Driven Multimodal Brain-State Decoding for Personalized Closed-Loop TENS: A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our research evaluates advanced artificial (AI) methodologies to enhance diagnostic accuracy in pulmonary radiography. Utilizing DenseNet121 and ResNet50, we analyzed 108,948 chest X-ray images from 32,717 patients and DenseNet121 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 94% in identifying the conditions of pneumothorax and oedema. The model's performance surpassed that of expert radiologists, though further improvements are necessary for diagnosing complex conditions such as emphysema, effusion, and hernia. Clinical validation integrating Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Named Entity Recognition (NER) demonstrated the potential of natural language processing (NLP) in clinical workflows. The NER system achieved a precision of 92% and a recall of 88%. Sentiment analysis using DistilBERT provided a nuanced understanding of clinical notes, which is essential for refining diagnostic decisions. XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) enhanced feature extraction and model interpretability. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and occlusion sensitivity analysis further enriched transparency, enabling healthcare providers to trust AI predictions. These AI techniques reduced processing times by 60% and annotation errors by 75%, setting a new benchmark for efficiency in thoracic diagnostics. The research explored the transformative potential of AI in medical imaging, advancing traditional diagnostics and accelerating medical evaluations in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.