Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39202291›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Classification of Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Proposal for Revision.

Seong Joon Ahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seong Joon AhnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-8344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing universal standards for the nomenclature and classification of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy is essential. This review summarizes the classifications used for categorizing the patterns of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy and grading its severity in the literature, highlighting the limitations of these classifications based on recent findings. To overcome these limitations, I propose categorizing hydroxychloroquine retinopathy into four categories based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings: parafoveal (parafoveal damage only), pericentral (pericentral damage only), combined parafoveal and pericentral (both parafoveal and pericentral damage), and posterior polar (widespread damage over parafoveal, pericentral, and more peripheral areas), with or without foveal involvement. Alternatively, eyes can be categorized simply into parafoveal and pericentral retinopathy based on the most dominant area of damage, rather than the topographic distribution of overall retinal damage. Furthermore, I suggest a five-stage modified version of the current three-stage grading system of disease severity based on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) as follows: 0, no hyperautofluorescence (normal); 1, localized parafoveal or pericentral hyperautofluorescence on FAF; 2, hyperautofluorescence extending greater than 180° around the fovea; 3, combined retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) defects (hypoautofluorescence on FAF) without foveal involvement; and 4, fovea-involving hypoautofluorescence. These classification systems can better address the topographic characteristics of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy using disease patterns and assess the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy by stage, particularly with foveal involvement.

Indexed as

classificationdisease patternhydroxychloroquine retinopathystage

Identifiers

PMID39202291
PMCPMC11353870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.