Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39202453›Full record

ReviewGenes2024

Genetic and Pathophysiological Basis of Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Laminopathies.

Shruti Bhide, Sahaana Chandran, Namakkal S Rajasekaran, Girish C Melkani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular mechanism on autophagy associated cardiovascular dysfunction inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shruti BhideDepartment of Biology, Molecular Biology Institute, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Sahaana ChandranDepartment of Biology, Molecular Biology Institute, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Namakkal S RajasekaranDepartment of Pathology, Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Girish C MelkaniDepartment of Biology, Molecular Biology Institute, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-4633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear lamins, a type V intermediate filament, are crucial components of the nuclear envelope's inner layer, maintaining nuclear integrity and mediating interactions between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Research on human iPSC-derived cells and animal models has demonstrated the importance of lamins in cardiac and skeletal muscle development and function. Mutations in lamins result in laminopathies, a group of diseases including muscular dystrophies, Hutchison-Gilford progeria syndrome, and cardiomyopathies with conduction defects. These conditions have been linked to disrupted autophagy, mTOR, Nrf2-Keap, and proteostasis signaling pathways, indicating complex interactions between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Despite progress in understanding these pathways, many questions remain about the mechanisms driving lamin-induced pathologies, leading to limited therapeutic options. This review examines the current literature on dysregulated pathways in cardiac and skeletal muscle laminopathies and explores potential therapeutic strategies for these conditions.

Indexed as

LaminopathiesMuscle, SkeletalAnimalsCardiomyopathiesHumansLaminsMuscular DystrophiesMutationMyocardiumSignal TransductionLaminsagingautophagy-signalingcardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle dysfunctionlaminopathiesNrf2-signalingredox-homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID39202453
PMCPMC11354015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.