Evidence mapPaperPMID 39202863Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Phytocompounds and Nanoformulations for Anticancer Therapy: A Review.

Giuseppina Bozzuto, Annarica Calcabrini, Marisa Colone, Maria Condello, Maria Luisa Dupuis, Evelin Pellegrini, Annarita Stringaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Natural flavonoid isoorientin and its anticancer mechanisms: a systematic review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bridging bioactive metabolites ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuseppina BozzutoNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-3326
Annarica CalcabriniNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9600-1117
Marisa ColoneNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-7483
Maria CondelloNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2802-9142
Maria Luisa DupuisNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-8261
Evelin PellegriniLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-3299
Annarita StringaroNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0143-2978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease that affects millions of people and remains a major public health problem worldwide. Conventional cancer treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, have limited achievements and multiple drawbacks, among which are healthy tissue damage and multidrug-resistant phenotype onset. Increasing evidence shows that many plants' natural products, as well as their bioactive compounds, have promising anticancer activity and exhibit minimal toxicity compared to conventional anticancer drugs. However, their widespread use in cancer therapy is severely restricted by limitations in terms of their water solubility, absorption, lack of stability, bioavailability, and selective targeting. The use of nanoformulations for plants' natural product transportation and delivery could be helpful in overcoming these limitations, thus enhancing their therapeutic efficacy and providing the basis for improved anticancer treatment strategies. The present review is aimed at providing an update on some phytocompounds (curcumin, resveratrol, quercetin, and cannabinoids, among others) and their main nanoformulations showing antitumor activities, both in vitro and in vivo, against such different human cancer types as breast and colorectal cancer, lymphomas, malignant melanoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and osteosarcoma. The intracellular pathways underlying phytocompound anticancer activity and the main advantages of nanoformulation employment are also examined. Finally, this review critically analyzes the research gaps and limitations causing the limited success of phytocompounds' and nanoformulations' clinical translation.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNeoplasmsPhytochemicalsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPhytochemicalsanticancer therapycombined therapiesdrug deliverydrug resistancehuman cancernanocarriersnanoformulationsnanomedicinenatural productsphytocompounds

Identifiers

PMID39202863
PMCPMC11357218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.