Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39205127›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Introduction to Ventra: A Programmable Abdominal Phantom for Training, Educational, Research, and Development Purposes.

Salar Tayebi, Robert Wise, Ashkan Zarghami, Wojciech Dabrowski, Manu L N G Malbrain, Johan Stiens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salar TayebiDepartment of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6751-1858
Robert WiseAdult Intensive Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5237-5582
Ashkan ZarghamiDepartment of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0006-8892-3361
Wojciech DabrowskiFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-2375
Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-5255
Johan StiensDepartment of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-7885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a critical parameter in the care of critically ill patients, as elevated IAP can lead to reduced cardiac output and organ perfusion, potentially resulting in multiple organ dysfunction and failure. The current gold standard for measuring IAP is an indirect technique via the bladder. According to the Abdominal Compartment Society's Guidelines, new measurement methods/devices for IAP must be validated against the gold standard.

objectivesThis study introduces Ventra, an abdominal phantom designed to simulate different IAP levels, abdominal compliance, respiration-related IAP variations, and bladder dynamics. Ventra aims to facilitate the development and validation of new IAP measurement devices while reducing reliance on animal and cadaveric studies. Additionally, it offers potential applications in training and education for biomedical engineering students. This study provides a thorough explanation on the phantom's design and fabrication, which provides a low-cost solution for advancing IAP measurement research and education. The design concept, technical aspects, and a series of validation experiments determining whether Ventra is a suitable tool for future research are presented in this study.

methodsVentra's performance was evaluated through a series of validation tests using a pressure gauge and two intra-gastric (Spiegelberg and CiMON) and two intra-bladder (Accuryn and TraumaGuard) pressure measurement devices. The mean and standard deviation of IAP recordings by each device were investigated. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate bias, precision, limits of agreement, and percentage error for each system. Concordance analysis was performed to assess the ability of Ventra in tracking IAP changes.

resultsThe phantom demonstrated excellent agreement with reference pressure measurements, showing an average bias of 0.11 ± 0.49 mmHg. A concordance coefficient of 100% was observed for the phantom as well. Ventra accurately simulated different abdominal compliances, with higher IAP values resulting in lower compliance. Abdominal volume changes showed a bias of 0.08 ± 0.07 L/min, and bladder fill volume measurements showed an average difference of 0.90 ± 4.33 mL for volumes ranging from 50 to 500 mL.

conclusionThe validation results were in agreement with the research guidelines of the world abdominal society. Ventra is a reliable tool that will facilitate the development and validation of new IAP measurement devices. It is an effective educational tool for biomedical engineering students as well.

Indexed as

AbdomenPhantoms, ImagingPressureHumansUrinary Bladderabdominal complianceabdominal pressure variationbladder pressuregastric pressurehuman phantomintra-abdominal pressuresimulation

Identifiers

PMID39205127
PMCPMC11359502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.