ArticleNeurobiology of aging2024
Predicting brain atrophy and cognitive aging trajectories with baseline subjective cognitive concerns in cognitively normal older adults.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote, self-administered, smartphone cognitive testing in a registry-based cohort: Feasibility, reliability, and validity findings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Evaluating self- and informant-reported complaints as predictors of cognitive progression in subjective cognitive decline: A clinically-based evaluation.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Remote, self-administered, smartphone cognitive testing in a registry-based cohort: Feasibility, reliability, and validity findings.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.