Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39208388›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Digital assessment of cognitive-affective biases related to mental health.

Sang-Eon Park, Jisu Chung, Jeonghyun Lee, Minwoo Jb Kim, Jinhee Kim, Hong Jin Jeon, Hyungsook Kim, Choongwan Woo, Hackjin Kim, Sang Ah Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sang-Eon ParkDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8724-8698
Jisu ChungDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeonghyun LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minwoo Jb KimDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinhee KimSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Jin JeonDepartment of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyungsook KimHanyang Digital Healthcare Center, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Choongwan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Hackjin KimSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Ah LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an increasing societal need for digital therapy solutions for poor mental health, we face a corresponding rise in demand for scientifically validated digital contents. In this study we aimed to lay a sound scientific foundation for the development of brain-based digital therapeutics to assess and monitor cognitive effects of social and emotional bias across diverse populations and age-ranges. First, we developed three computerized cognitive tasks using animated graphics: 1) an emotional flanker task designed to test attentional bias, 2) an emotional go-no-go task to measure bias in memory and executive function, and 3) an emotional social evaluation task to measure sensitivity to social judgments. Then, we confirmed the generalizability of our results in a wide range of samples (children (N = 50), young adults (N = 172), older adults (N = 39), online young adults (N=93), and depression patients (N = 41)) using touchscreen and online computer-based tasks, and devised a spontaneous thought generation task that was strongly associated with, and therefore could potentially serve as an alternative to, self-report scales. Using PCA, we extracted five components that represented different aspects of cognitive-affective function (emotional bias, emotional sensitivity, general accuracy, and general/social attention). Next, a gamified version of the above tasks was developed to test the feasibility of digital cognitive training over a 2-week period. A pilot training study utilizing this application showed decreases in emotional bias in the training group (that were not observed in the control group), which was correlated with a reduction in anxiety symptoms. Using a 2-channel wearable EEG system, we found that frontal alpha and gamma power were associated with both emotional bias and its reduction across the 2-week training period.

Identifiers

PMID39208388
PMCPMC11361731

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.