ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2024
Digital disease management programme reduces chronic gastrointestinal symptoms among racially and socially vulnerable populations.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Diet and ileostomy: a qualitative comparison of patient and healthcare professional perspectives in the United Kingdom and Australia.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- The Impact of a Digital Digestive Health Program and Telehealth Visits in Socially Vulnerable Populations: Cohort Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveConsiderable disparities exist in access to gastrointestinal (GI) care and digestive outcomes across gender, racial, and socioeconomic groups. We evaluated (1) whether adults with chronic GI symptoms from diverse demographic groups would use a digital digestive care programme and (2) the effects of participation on GI symptom severity and other patient-reported outcomes.
methodsAccess to a digital digestive chronic care programme was provided to participants regardless of prior digestive diagnoses or symptoms for 90 days. The intervention included GI symptom tracking, personalised medical nutrition therapy, GI-specific health coaching, and targeted education on common GI symptoms. We assigned a Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) score to each participant according to their home address and compared baseline and end-intervention symptoms and other patient-reported outcomes by gender, race/ethnicity, and SVI.
resultsOf the 1936 participants, mean age was 43.1 years; 67% identified as white/Caucasian, 11% Asian/Pacific Islander, 6% Hispanic/Latinx, 7% black/African American, and 7% of multiple races. Participants of all demographic groups used the app symptom logging, reviewed educational materials, and interacted with their care team and reported similar statistically significant improvements in GI symptoms (by the end of the intervention, 85% improved, p<0.05). Participants reported feeling greater control of their health (83%), better able to manage their digestive symptoms (83%), increased happiness (76%), and greater productivity at work (54%), with black/African Americans and Native Americans most likely to report these changes.
conclusionWe conclude that a digital GI disease management programme may be of value in reducing disparities in access to GI care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.