Evidence mapPaperPMID 39209478Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2024

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease.

Bradley A Maron, Guillermo Bortman, Teresa De Marco, Jessica H Huston, Irene M Lang, Stephan H Rosenkranz, Jean-Luc Vachiéry, Ryan J Tedford

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07082400 (Screening and Phenotyping of Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction .), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07082400 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Screening and Phenotyping of Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction .

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsPulmonary HypertensionArmsright heart catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Updates in Pulmonary Hypertension.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostic and management dilemmas in pulmonary hypertension.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bradley A MaronDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Guillermo BortmanTransplant Unit, Heart Failure and PH Program, Sanatorio Trinidad Mitre and Sanatorio Trinidad Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Teresa De MarcoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jessica H HustonAscension Saint Thomas Health, Nashville, TN, USA.
Irene M LangMedical University of Vienna AUSTRIA Center of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-2692
Stephan H RosenkranzDepartment of Cardiology and Cologne Cardiovascular Research Center (CCRC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jean-Luc VachiéryHUB (Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles) Erasme, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium jean.luc.vachiery@hubruxelles.be.
Ryan J TedfordDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left heart disease (LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH), which may be classified further as isolated post-capillary (ipcPH) or combined post- and pre-capillary PH (cpcPH). The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension PH-LHD task force reviewed newly reported randomised clinical trials and contemplated novel opportunities for improving outcome. Results from major randomised clinical trials reinforced prior recommendations against the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in PH-LHD outside of clinical trials, and suggested possible harm. Greater focus on phenotyping was viewed as one general strategy by which to ultimately improve clinical outcomes. This is potentially achievable by individualising ipcPH

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryHemodynamicsHumansPulmonary Wedge PressureRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39209478
PMCPMC11525340

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.