ArticleBMJ open2024
Reducing refusals of care through improved personal care interactions between caregivers and people with dementia: protocol for a realist synthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Can We Improve Personal Care Interactions to Reduce Care Refusals From People With Dementia? A Realist Synthesis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeople with dementia develop progressive difficulties conducting basic activities of daily living, often requiring considerable assistance from caregivers. Many people with dementia, particularly in the advanced stages, can refuse assistance with care leading to difficult interactions. The ways in which refusals of care can be best reduced are unknown. Using a realist approach, this study aims to develop and refine evidence-based programme theories showing which mechanisms of interventions contribute to reducing refusals of care between caregivers and people with dementia, in which contexts, how and why. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The realist synthesis will be conducted in three iterative stages.Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories through secondary analysis of caregivers and persons with dementia interviews and observations, a preliminary exploratory literature review and team discussions. After initial programme theory development, the focus of the synthesis will be decided by the study team.Stage 2 will involve conducting focused, iterative and targeted literature searches to test and refine our initial programme theories considering the evidence for each setting: hospital, care home, home care and family. Data synthesis will use a realist lens to examine what works for whom in what circumstances and how, and organise related evidence to context-mechanism-outcome configurations whenever possible.Stage 3 will use stakeholder interviews to explore reactions to the programme theories and enhance validity after integration of these findings, recommendations and conclusions will be developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The NHS Social Care Research Ethics Committee has approved the interview stage of this study (REC reference: 24/IEC08/0007; IRAS project ID: 338274). Informed consent will be obtained from all interviewees prior to data collection. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and accessible information for key stakeholders. PROPSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024496072.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.