Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39210404›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2024

Effects of dietary restriction and one-carbon metabolite supplementation during the first 63 days of gestation on the maternal gut, vaginal, and blood microbiota in cattle.

Sarah M Luecke, Godson Aryee, Devin B Holman, Kaycie N Schmidt, Layla E King, Matthew S Crouse, Alison K Ward, Carl R Dahlen, Joel S Caton, Samat Amat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah M LueckeDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Godson AryeeDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Devin B HolmanLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Kaycie N SchmidtDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Layla E KingDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Matthew S CrouseUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Alison K WardDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Joel S CatonDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Samat AmatDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA. samat.amat@ndsu.edu.

Funding

Agriculture Food and Resource Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-07055- 2009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal diet quality and quantity have significant impacts on both maternal and fetal health and development. The composition and function of the maternal gut microbiome is also significantly influenced by diet; however, little is known about the impact of gestational nutrient restriction on the bovine maternal microbiome during early gestation, which is a critical stage for maternal microbiome-mediated fetal programming to take place. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impacts of diet restriction and one-carbon metabolite (OCM) supplementation during early gestation on maternal ruminal, vaginal, and blood microbiota in cattle. Thirty-three beef heifers (approx. 14 months old) were used in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment with main factors of target gain (control [CON]; targeted 0.45 kg/d gain vs restricted [RES]; targeted - 0.23 kg/d gain), and OCM supplementation (+ OCM vs - OCM; n = 8/treatment; except n = 9 for RES-OCM). Heifers were individually fed, starting treatment at breeding (d 0) and concluding at d 63 of gestation. Ruminal fluid and vaginal swabs were collected on d - 2, d 35, and d 63 (at necropsy) and whole blood was collected on d 63 (necropsy). Bacterial microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4) sequencing.

resultsOverall ruminal microbiota structure was affected by gain, OCM, time, and their interactions. The RES heifers had greater microbial richness (observed ASVs) but neither Shannon nor Inverse Simpson diversity was significantly influenced by gain or OCM supplementation; however, on d 63, 34 bacterial genera showed differential abundance in the ruminal fluid, with 25 genera enriched in RES heifers as compared to CON heifers. In addition, the overall interaction network structure of the ruminal microbiota changed due to diet restriction. The vaginal microbiota community structure was influenced by gain and time. Overall microbial richness and diversity of the vaginal microbiota steadily increased as pregnancy progressed. The vaginal ecological network structure was distinctive between RES and CON heifers with genera-genera interactions being intensified in RES heifers. A relatively diverse bacterial community was detected in blood samples, and the composition of the blood microbiota differed from that of ruminal and vaginal microbiota.

conclusionRestricted dietary intake during early gestation induced significant alterations in the ruminal microbiota which also extended to the vaginal microbiota. The composition of these two microbial communities was largely unaffected by OCM supplementation. Blood associated microbiota was largely distinctive from the ruminal and vaginal microbiota.

Indexed as

Beef cattleBloodDietary restrictionMaternal microbiotaOne carbon metabolite supplementationRumenVagina

Identifiers

PMID39210404
PMCPMC11360793

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.