ArticleJournal of global health2024
Association of handgrip strength with health care utilisation among older adults: A longitudinal study in China.
Article in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and health care utilisation among Chinese older adults is scarce. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of HGS with health care utilisation and to identify whether these associations varied by gender. Methods: The analytic sample of this prospective cohort study included 6007 Chinese older adults (≥60 years) from 2011 to 2018 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A handgrip dynamometer was used to measure HGS. We measured health care utilisation by outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and unmet hospitalisation needs. We used covariates-adjusted general estimating equations for the analyses. Results: Longitudinal results showed that participants with weakness increased the likelihood of outpatient visits (odds ratio (OR) = 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.27), inpatient visits (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.32-1.73), and unmet hospitalisation needs (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.19-1.79) than their counterparts. Participants with weakness increased the number of outpatient visits (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.11-1.51) and the number of inpatient visits (IRR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.10-1.61). Participants with HGS asymmetry increased the likelihood of unmet hospitalisation needs (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.03-1.43) than their counterparts. The results of the impact of every one-kilogramme (kg) increase in HGS on health care utilisation indicated consistent results. The associations were similarly observed irrespective of gender. Conclusions: Chinese older adults with weakness or HGS asymmetry used more health care. Interventions for improving muscle strength and correcting strength asymmetry are highly recommended, with the potential to considerably save households and health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.