Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211018›Full record

ArticleMediterranean journal of rheumatology2024

Vegan Glucosamine versus Crustacean Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis: Choosing the Correct One During Clinical Practice.

Hitesh Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hitesh VermaBiofern Life Sciences Pvt Ltd, Vemgal Industrial Area, Kolar District, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present commentary critically evaluates the role of glucosamine in joint health, specifically exploring the potential of vegan glucosamine as an alternative of crustacean glucosamine. While acknowledging glucosamine's established benefits in managing osteoarthritis, this commentary underscores concern regarding the limited data supporting the clinical use of vegan glucosamine. Methodological flaws in the bioequivalence study, lax quality parameters, and the absence of safety data for E. coli-derived vegan glucosamine are highlighted. The commentary calls for caution in endorsing vegan glucosamine for osteoarthritis patients, stressing the need for further research and a thorough evaluation of its efficacy and safety before widespread clinical adoption.

Indexed as

clinical practicecrustacean glucosamineglucosamineshrimp glucosaminevegan glucosamine

Identifiers

PMID39211018
PMCPMC11350419

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.