Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211479›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Comparative SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 variant and D614G-Wuhan strain infections in ferrets: insights into attenuation and disease progression during subclinical to mild COVID-19.

Sandra Barroso-Arévalo, Lidia Sánchez-Morales, Néstor Porras, Marta Díaz-Frutos, Jose A Barasona, Julio Isla, Débora López, Christian Gortázar, Lucas Domínguez, Jose M Sánchez-Vizcaíno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandra Barroso-ArévaloDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lidia Sánchez-MoralesVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Néstor PorrasVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Díaz-FrutosDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose A BarasonaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Julio IslaSabiotec SL, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Débora LópezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Christian GortázarSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose M Sánchez-VizcaínoDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve and new variants emerge, it becomes crucial to understand the comparative pathological and immunological responses elicited by different strains. This study focuses on the original Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant, which have demonstrated significant differences in clinical outcomes and immune responses. Methods: We employed ferrets as an experimental model to assess the D614G variant (a derivative of the Wuhan strain) and the Omicron BA.5 variant. Each variant was inoculated into separate groups of ferrets to compare disease severity, viral dissemination, and immune responses. Results: The D614G variant induced more severe disease and greater viral spread than the Omicron variant. Notably, ferrets infected with the D614G variant exhibited a robust neutralizing antibody response, whereas those infected with the Omicron variant failed to produce a detectable neutralizing antibody response. Despite the clearance of the virus from nearly all tissues by 7 days post-infection, an increase in pathological lesions was observed from 14 to 21 days, particularly in those infected with the D614G variant, suggesting a sustained immune response even after viral clearance. Discussion: These findings underscore the adaptability of SARS-CoV-2 and illuminate how susceptibility and clinical manifestations vary across different strains and species. The results emphasize the necessity of considering both the direct effects of viral infection and the indirect, often prolonged, impacts of the immune response in evaluating the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Indexed as

attenuationexperimental modelferretsOmicronpathogenesisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39211479
PMCPMC11358085

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.