Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212989›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Racial Disparities in Cancer Stage at Diagnosis and Survival for Adolescents and Young Adults.

Kekoa Taparra, Kaeo Kekumano, Ryan Benavente, Luke Roberto, Megan Gimmen, Ryan Shontell, Henrietta Cakobau, Neha Deo, Connor J Kinslow, Allison Betof Warner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Surgical Capacity in Guam: Current Strengths and Future Goals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kekoa TaparraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kaeo KekumanoDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ryan BenaventeHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Luke RobertoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
Megan GimmenHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ryan ShontellDepartment of Native Hawaiian Health, University of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu.
Henrietta CakobauDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Berkeley.
Neha DeoInternal Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Mass General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Connor J KinslowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Allison Betof WarnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Jaimie Z ShingDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Jacqueline B VoRadiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Manali I PatelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California.
Erqi PollomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

CAPRI: Columbia Cancer Research Training Program for Resident-InvestigatorsR38CA277850 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Katherine D Crew, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R38 CA277850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are limited studies assessing stage at diagnosis and risk of death among all 5 federally defined races in the US among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. Objective: To identify racial disparities in stage at diagnosis and survival among AYA patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from a US national hospital-based oncology database on AYA patients, aged 15 to 39 years, with the 10 deadliest cancers among AYA patients who received a diagnosis from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2017, with 6 months or more of follow-up. Analyses by race were categorized by the 5 federally defined races in the US: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White). White patients served as the majority reference group. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were late stage at diagnosis (logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios [AORs] and 95% CIs) and overall survival (log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression with adjusted hazard ratios [AHRs] and 95% CIs). Results: A total of 291 899 AYA patients (median age, 33 years [IQR, 28-37 years]; 186 549 female patients [64%]; 189 812 [65%] with stage I or II cancers) were evaluated. The cohort included 1457 American Indian or Alaska Native patients (1%), 8412 Asian patients (3%), 40 851 Black patients (14%), 987 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander patients (0.3%), and 240 192 White patients (82%). Cancers included breast (n = 79 195 [27%]), lymphoma (n = 45 500 [16%]), melanoma (n = 36 724 [13%]), testis (n = 31 413 [11%]), central nervous system (n = 26 070 [9%]), colon or rectum (n = 22 545 [8%]), cervix (n = 20 923 [7%]), sarcoma (n = 14 951 [5%]), ovary (n = 8982 [3%]), and lung (n = 5596 [2%]). Risk of late-stage diagnosis was higher for Asian (AOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14-1.26), Black (AOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.36-1.43), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (AOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.55) patients compared with White patients. Overall survival differed by race for all cancer sites, except cancers of the central nervous system and ovary. Risk of death was higher for American Indian or Alaska Native (AHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.30), Black (AHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.19-1.26), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (AHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44) patients but lower for Asian patients (AHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95) compared with White patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of AYA patients suggests that stage at diagnosis and survival varied across races for the 10 deadliest AYA cancers. These results support the need for tailored interventions and informed public policy to achieve cancer care equity for all races.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39212989
PMCPMC11365006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.