ArticleAging2024
Identifying novel circadian rhythm biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of melanoma by an integrated bioinformatics and machine learning approach.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutaneous Melanoma in the Context of Aging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Diabetes mellitus and glymphatic dysfunction: Roles for oxidative stress, mitochondria, circadian rhythm, artificial intelligence, and imaging.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Development and validation of machine learning model to predict early death of melanoma brain metastasis patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly malignant skin tumor with poor prognosis. Circadian rhythm is closely related to melanoma pathogenesis. This study aimed to identify key circadian rhythm genes (CRGs) in melanoma and explore their potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Microarray data of melanoma tissues and normal skins were obtained. Differentially expressed genes were identified and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to screen hub genes associated with melanoma. By overlapping hub genes with known CRGs, 125 melanoma-related CRGs were identified. Functional enrichment analysis revealed these CRGs were mainly involved in circadian rhythm and other cancer-related pathways. Three machine learning algorithms including LASSO regression, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and random forest were utilized to select key CRGs. Six CRGs (ABCC2, CA14, EGR3, FBXW7, LDHB, and PSEN2) were identified as key CRGs for melanoma diagnosis and prognosis. Diagnostic values of key CRGs were evaluated by ROC analysis in training and validation sets. Prognostic values of key CRGs were assessed by survival analysis and a multivariate Cox regression prognostic model was constructed. The prognostic model could effectively stratify melanoma patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different survival. A nomogram integrating clinical variables and risk score was built to predict 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival of melanoma patients. In summary, six CRGs were identified as key genes associated with melanoma pathogenesis and may serve as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. The prognostic model and nomogram could facilitate personalized prognosis evaluation of melanoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.