Class-Wide Analysis of Frizzled-Dishevelled Interactions Using BRET Biosensors Reveals Functional Differences among Receptor Paralogs.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Targeting frizzleds with small-molecule compounds-back to square one or light at the end of the tunnel?The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
   Review
2. In silico docking yields small molecule negative allosteric modulators targeting the core of Frizzled 7.Nature communications · 2025
   Article
3. WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling.Nature communications · 2025
   Article
4. A Putative Frizzled 7-Targeting Compound Acts as a Firefly Luciferase Inhibitor.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as