ArticlePediatric research2025
Fetal exposure to toxic metals (mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic) via intrauterine blood transfusions.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrauterine blood transfusions (IUBTs) are critical for treating fetal anemia but may expose fetuses to toxic metals. This study assessed mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and arsenic (As) levels in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion bags used during pregnancy, examined metal exposure in maternal and cord blood, and evaluated fetal health risks.
methodsThirty pregnant women who underwent intrauterine blood IUBTs were enrolled in this study. Metal concentrations were measured in one to nine transfusion bags for each participant. These bags contained 8-103 mL volumes and were administered between gestational weeks 18 and 35. We also tested the mothers' blood for metal levels in the final stages of pregnancy and the umbilical cord blood at birth. The assessment utilized the intravenous reference dose (IVRfD) and the hazard index (HI) to evaluate the non-carcinogenic health risks these metals might pose to the fetus.
resultsMetals were detectable in almost all transfusion bags. The IVRfD was exceeded for Hg in 16 fetuses, Cd in 8 fetuses, Pb in 30 fetuses, and As in 1 fetus. Significant correlations were found between the concentrations of Hg, Cd, and As in transfused RBCs and cord blood. No correlations were observed between these concentrations and maternal blood levels, except for Cd. The influence of multiple IUBTs was positively associated only with Cd levels in the cord (ß = 0.529, 95% confidence intervals (CI) between 0.180 and 0.879). The HI exceeded 1, indicating significant health risks, predominantly from Pb, followed by Hg and Cd.
conclusionThe findings of this study highlight the significant risk of fetal exposure to toxic metals, mainly Pb, through IUBTs. This underscores the critical need for prescreening blood donors for toxic metals to minimize the potential for long-term adverse effects on the fetus. The research stresses the necessity of balancing the immediate benefits of IUBTs against the risks of toxic metal exposure, underscoring the importance of safeguarding fetal health through improved screening practices. IMPACT: This study highlights the risk of toxic metal exposure through IUBTs, a treatment for fetal anemia. Hg, Cd, Pb, and As levels were measured in transfusion bags and linked to fetal exposure through maternal and umbilical cord blood analysis. The HI indicates significant Pb exposure risks, underscoring the need for mandatory blood donor screening. Recommendations include shifting toward safer practices in managing fetal anemia to protect fetal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.