Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215282›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Integrating causal pathway diagrams into practice facilitation to address colorectal cancer screening disparities in primary care.

Brooke Ike, Ashley Johnson, Rosemary Meza, Allison Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brooke IkeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354982, Seattle, WA, 98195-4982, USA. bike2@uw.edu.
Ashley JohnsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354982, Seattle, WA, 98195-4982, USA.
Rosemary MezaKaiser Permanente Washington, Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1360, Seattle, WA, 98101-1466, USA.
Allison ColeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354982, Seattle, WA, 98195-4982, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Optimizing Implementation in Cancer Control: OPTICC - Research Program CoreP50CA244432 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2019 to 2023
$4.6M
Rural Community Support for ColonoscopyR01CA254515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Allison Cole, Brooke Ike · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA244432-03NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death and the second most common cancer diagnosis among the Hispanic population in the United States. However, CRC screening prevalence remains lower among Hispanic adults than among non-Hispanic white adults. To reduce CRC screening disparities, efforts to implement CRC screening evidence-based interventions in primary care organizations (PCOs) must consider their potential effect on existing screening disparities. More research is needed to understand how to leverage existing implementation science methodologies to improve health disparities. The Coaching to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Equity (CoachIQ) pilot study explores whether integrating two implementation science tools, Causal Pathway Diagrams and practice facilitation, is a feasible and effective way to address CRC screening disparities among Hispanic patients.

methodsWe used a quasi-experimental, mixed methods design to evaluate feasibility and assess initial signals of effectiveness of the CoachIQ approach. Three PCOs received coaching from CoachIQ practice facilitators over a 12-month period. Three non-equivalent comparison group PCOs received coaching during the same period as participants in a state quality improvement program. We conducted descriptive analyses of screening rates and coaching activities.

resultsThe CoachIQ practice facilitators discussed equity, facilitated prioritization of QI activities, and reviewed CRC screening disparities during a higher proportion of coaching encounters than the comparison group practice facilitator. While the mean overall CRC screening rate in the comparison PCOs increased from 34 to 41%, the mean CRC screening rate for Hispanic patients did not increase from 30%. In contrast, the mean overall CRC screening rate at the CoachIQ PCOs increased from 41 to 44%, and the mean CRC screening rate for Hispanic patients increased from 35 to 39%.

conclusionsThe CoachIQ program merges two implementation science methodologies, practice facilitation and causal pathway diagrams, to help PCOs focus quality improvement efforts on improving CRC screening while also reducing screening disparities. Results from this pilot study demonstrate key differences between CoachIQ facilitation and standard facilitation, and point to the potential of the CoachIQ approach to decrease disparities in CRC screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoPrimary Health CareAgedCritical PathwaysFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementUnited StatesCausal pathway diagramColorectal cancer screeningImplementationPractice facilitationPrimary careQuality improvementScreening disparities

Identifiers

PMID39215282
PMCPMC11365243

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.