ArticleNature communications2024
Artificial selection of mutations in two nearby genes gave rise to shattering resistance in soybean.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Stable loci and functional gene controlling pod shattering resistance across multiple environments under different genetic backgrounds in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Biological characteristics of transgenic glyphosate-resistant semiwild soybean and its competitive ability against weeds for survival.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Structure, Classification, Functional Diversity and Regulatory Mechanism of Plant C2H2 Transcription Factors.Biology · 2026Review
- Molecular polymorphisms that underlie trait variation in crops: Lessons learned from soybean.The plant genome · 2026Review
- The current state of Japanese soybean breeding using DNA marker technology.Breeding science · 2026Article
- Review
- Pod Dehiscence in Soybean: Genome Wide Association Study and Genomic Prediction.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Silique Dehiscence in Rapeseed: A Review of Research Progress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resistance to pod shattering is a key domestication-related trait selected for seed production in many crops. Here, we show that the transition from shattering in wild soybeans to shattering resistance in cultivated soybeans resulted from selection of mutations within the coding sequences of two nearby genes - Sh1 and Pdh1. Sh1 encodes a C2H2-like zinc finger transcription factor that promotes shattering by repressing SHAT1-5 expression, thereby reducing the secondary wall thickness of fiber cap cells in the abscission layers of pod sutures, while Pdh1 encodes a dirigent protein that orchestrates asymmetric lignin distribution in inner sclerenchyma, creating torsion in pod walls that facilitates shattering. Integration analyses of quantitative trait locus mapping, genome-wide association studies, and allele distribution in representative soybean germplasm suggest that these two genes are primary modulators underlying this domestication trait. Our study thus provides comprehensive understanding regarding the genetic, molecular, and cellular bases of shattering resistance in soybeans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.