ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2024
Massively parallel approaches for characterizing noncoding functional variation in human evolution.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massively parallel characterization and predictive modelling of neuronal regulatory variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In Vitro Massively Parallel Screening of Human Regulatory Elements Involved in Postcranial Skeletal Development for Differential Activity Compared to Chimpanzee.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Global Evaluation of Congenital Heart Disease-Associated Non-Coding Variants.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic differences underlying unique phenotypes in humans compared to our closest primate relatives have long remained a mystery. Similarly, the genetic basis of adaptations between human groups during our expansion across the globe is poorly characterized. Uncovering the downstream phenotypic consequences of these genetic variants has been difficult, as a substantial portion lies in noncoding regions, such as cis-regulatory elements (CREs). Here, we review recent high-throughput approaches to measure the functions of CREs and the impact of variation within them. CRISPR screens can directly perturb CREs in the genome to understand downstream impacts on gene expression and phenotypes, while massively parallel reporter assays can decipher the regulatory impact of sequence variants. Machine learning has begun to be able to predict regulatory function from sequence alone, further scaling our ability to characterize genome function. Applying these tools across diverse phenotypes, model systems, and ancestries is beginning to revolutionize our understanding of noncoding variation underlying human evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.