Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218047›Full record

ArticleAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)2025

Operant ethanol self-administration behaviors do not predict sex differences in continuous access home cage drinking.

Hye Jean Yoon, Marie A Doyle, Megan E Altemus, Rishik Bethi, Sofia H Lago, Danny G Winder, Erin S Calipari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A model of ethanol self-administration in head-fixed mice.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hye Jean YoonDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marie A DoyleVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Neurobiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Megan E AltemusDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Rishik BethiDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sofia H LagoDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Danny G WinderVanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Neurobiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Erin S CalipariDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: erin.calipari@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007628 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BARNETT, JOEY VICTOR, KAVALALI, EGE T · 1985 to 2022
$11.2M
VAREC Research CoreP60AA031124 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Cody Siciliano · 2024 to 2026
$7.1M
Alcohol action on extended amygdala glutamate synapsesR37AA019455 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WINDER, DANNY G. · 2015 to 2024
$3.9M
Circuit control of motivation to take and seek alcoholR01AA030931 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Erin Calipari · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Alcohol action on extended amygdala glutamate synapsesR01AA019455 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WINDER, DANNY G. · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Defining the cell-type specific control of alcohol drinkingF31AA030916 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Hye Jean Yoon · 2023 to 2026
$152k
Investigating the role of BNST GluN2D subunit-containing NMDARs in ethanol-induced plasticity and behaviorF32AA029592 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOYLE, MARIE ALTHEA · 2021 to 2022
$133k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA030916NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA029592NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA031124NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019455NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030931NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA019455NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding sex differences in disease prevalence is critical to public health, particularly in the context of alcohol use disorder (AUD). The goal of this study was to understand sex differences in ethanol drinking behavior and define the precise conditions under which sex differences emerge. Consistent with prior work, C57BL/6J females drank more than males under continuous access two-bottle choice conditions. However, using ethanol self-administration - where an operant response results in access to an ethanol sipper for a fixed time period - we found no sex differences in operant response rates or ethanol consumption (volume per body weight consumed, as well as lick behavior). This remained true across a wide range of parameters including acquisition, when the ethanol sipper access period was manipulated, and when the concentration of the ethanol available was scaled. The only sex differences observed were in total ethanol consumption, which was explained by differences in body weight between males and females, rather than by sex differences in motivation to drink. Using dimensionality reduction approaches, we found that drinking behavior in the operant context did not cluster by sex, but rather clustered by high and low drinking phenotypes. Interestingly, these high and low drinking phenotypes in the operant context showed no correlation with those same categorizations in the home cage context within the same animals. These data underscore the complexity of sex differences in ethanol consumption, highlighting the important role that drinking conditions/context plays in the expression of these differences.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingConditioning, OperantEthanolSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBody WeightFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSelf AdministrationSex FactorsEthanolethanol self-administrationhomecage drinkingsex differences

Identifiers

PMID39218047
PMCPMC12034132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.