Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218821›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Clinician Experiences of and Responses to the Challenges of Working with Patients in the Australian Compensation Setting.

Alison Sim, Amy G McNeilage, Trudy Rebbeck, Claire E Ashton-James

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison SimSydney Medical School (Northern Clinical School), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Douglas Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, 2065, Australia. alison.sim@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-9493
Amy G McNeilageSydney Medical School (Northern Clinical School), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Douglas Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, 2065, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-042X
Trudy RebbeckSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-4739
Claire E Ashton-JamesSydney Medical School (Northern Clinical School), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Douglas Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, 2065, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-4295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious research indicates that the compensation process is stressful for people with a compensable injury, contributing to poorer recovery. However, little is known about the challenges faced by clinicians who work in this setting. This study aims to qualitatively explore the experiences of clinicians delivering care to patients with compensable injuries in Australia. MATERIALS AND

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 experienced clinicians providing care to compensable patients in Australia. The interviews were transcribed, and data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants described their work as challenging due to factors such as high patient distress, poor clinical outcomes, and high administrative load. However, they responded to these challenges in varying ways. While some reported feelings of vicarious injustice, emotional exhaustion, and self-doubt, others derived a sense of meaning, purpose, and mastery from these challenges. Clinician responses to the challenge of working with people with a compensation claim were associated with access to mentoring, continuous education and training, and a supportive workplace culture.

conclusionClinicians reported both positive and negative responses to the challenges of working with people with a compensable injury. Coping strategies that were associated with more positive reactions included seeking further education, mentoring, peer support. Prioritising these support systems is important for clinician wellbeing and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelWorkers' CompensationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchClinicianDistressInsurerMotor-vehicle accidentQualitativeWorkers’ compensation

Identifiers

PMID39218821
PMCPMC12361309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.