ArticleCroatian medical journal2024
Regulator of calcineurin 3 as a novel predictor of diagnosis and prognosis in pan-cancer.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- N6-methyladenosine in cervical carcinogenesis: Mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess diagnostic and prognostic value of regulator of calcineurin 3 (RCAN3) in various malignancies.
methodsRCAN3 expression levels were assessed across pan-cancer data sets including various molecular and immune subtypes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were employed to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of RCAN3 in pan-cancer, respectively. Enrichment analyses were used to identify RCAN3-associated terms and pathways. A special focus was placed on cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma cervical cancer (CESC); we assessed the prognostic value of RCAN expression within distinct clinical subgroups and its effect on m6A modifications and immune infiltration.
resultsRCAN3 expression varied not only in different cancer types but also in different molecular and immune subtypes of cancers. RCAN3 displayed high accuracy in diagnosing and predicting cancers, and RCAN3 expression level was associated with the prognosis of certain cancers. CESC patients with a high RCAN3 level had a worse overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free interval. RCAN3 expression was related to multiple m6A modifier genes and immune cells.
conclusionIn general, RCAN3 can serve as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis in pan-cancer, especially in CESC. It may represent a promising molecular target for developing new treatments. However, our analysis is limited to bioinformatic predictions, and further biological experiments are necessary to verify our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39219199PMC11399725What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.