Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39220234›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in insect science2024

Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators.

Fabrice Requier, Myriam Abdelli, Mathilde Baude, David Genoud, Hadrien Gens, Benoît Geslin, Mickaël Henry, Lise Ropars

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in insect science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The GenusInsects · 2026
    Review
  2. Pollination ecology in the tropical Andes: moving towards a cross-scale approach.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabrice RequierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Myriam AbdelliUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Mathilde BaudeUniversité d'Orléans, Chateau de la Source, BP 6749, Cedex2, 45067, Orléans, France.
David Genoud3 Av. des Roses, 87240, Ambazac, France.
Hadrien GensAmis de la réserve naturelle du lac de Remoray, 25320, Labergement-Sainte-Marie, France.
Benoît GeslinAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Mickaël HenryINRAE, UR 406 Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France.
Lise RoparsCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, CP 135, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing pressures on bees, many beekeepers currently wish to move their managed livestock of

Indexed as

Apis melliferaBeekeepingBiodiversity conservationInsect pollinatorsInterspecific competitionWild bees

Identifiers

PMID39220234
PMCPMC11364274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.