Evidence mapPaperPMID 39220804Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Impact of a community health worker led intervention for improved blood pressure control in urban Nepal: an open-label cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sanju Bhattarai, Eva Skovlund, Archana Shrestha, Bente Prytz Mjølstad, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Abhijit Sen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05292469 (A Cluster Randomized Trial to Evaluate Comprehensive Approach to Hypertension Management in Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292469 nacompletednot on this map

A Cluster Randomized Trial to Evaluate Comprehensive Approach to Hypertension Management in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,252ConditionsHypertensionArmsComprehensive approach to hypertension management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanju BhattaraiDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eva SkovlundDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Archana ShresthaInstitute for Implementation Science and Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bente Prytz MjølstadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Bjørn Olav ÅsvoldDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Abhijit SenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective control of hypertension remains challenging in low and middle-income countries. We tested the effectiveness of comprehensive approaches to hypertension management including six home visits by community health workers with regular follow up by a trained healthcare provider on blood pressure levels in Nepal. Methods: We implemented a non-blinded, open-label, parallel-group, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial, with 1:1 allocation ratio in Budhanilakantha municipality, Kathmandu, Nepal. Ten public health facilities and their catchment area were randomly allocated to receive comprehensive intervention or only usual hypertension care. We recruited 1252 individuals aged 18 years and older with hypertension. The primary outcome was systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes were diastolic blood pressure, proportion with controlled blood pressure, waist to hip ratio, body mass index, physical activity, diet quality score, daily salt intake, adherence to antihypertensives, hypertension knowledge and perceived social support. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat using a linear mixed model. Findings: Participants were, on average 57 years old, 60% females, 84% married, 54% Brahmin/Chettri ethnicity and 33% were illiterate. The decrease in mean systolic blood pressure (1.7 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.1, 3.4) and diastolic blood pressure (1.6 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.5, 2.6) was more in the intervention arm compared to the control. The proportion with blood pressure control (OR 1.5 95% CI 1.0, 2.1) and engaging in adequate physical activity (≥600 Metabolic equivalents of task per week) (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6, 3.1) were higher in the intervention arm compared to control. The change in hypertension knowledge score was higher and daily salt intake was lower in the intervention arm compared to control. Waist to hip ratio increased more and global dietary requirement scores decreased more in the intervention group and there was no effect on the body mass index and adherence to antihypertensives. Interpretation: Community health workers facilitated home support and routine follow-up care by healthcare providers was effective in controlling blood pressure in urban Nepal. These findings suggest comprehensive interventions targeting individual, community and health system barriers are feasible in low resource settings, but larger implementation trials are needed to inform future scale-up. Funding: This work was supported by Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (Project number 981023100).

Indexed as

Community health workersComprehensive interventionHypertensionNepalPublic health

Identifiers

PMID39220804
PMCPMC11364134

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.