ArticleHeliyon2024
From molecular subgroups to molecular targeted therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A bioinformatics approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autophagy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnostic Biomarkers, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Inflammation · 2026Review
- Immunological heterogeneity in rheumatoid arthritis: challenges in early-stage stratification, non-response to targeted therapy, and the restoration of immune tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with multiple unidentified pathogenic factors. The inconsistency between molecular subgroups poses challenges for early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. In this study, we aimed to accurately distinguish RA patients at the transcriptome level using bioinformatics methods. 2Methods: We collected a total of 362 transcriptome datasets from RA patients in three independent samples from the GEO database. Consensus clustering was performed to identify molecular subgroups, and clinical features were assessed. Differential analysis was employed to annotate the biological functions of specifically upregulated genes between subgroups. 3Results: Based on consensus clustering of RA samples, we identified three robust molecular subgroups, with Subgroup III representing the high-risk subgroup and Subgroup II exhibiting a milder phenotype, possibly associated with relatively higher levels of autophagic ability. Subgroup I showed biological functions mainly related to viral infections, cellular metabolism, protein synthesis, and inflammatory responses. Subgroup II involved autophagy of mitochondria and organelles, protein localization, and organelle disassembly pathways, suggesting heterogeneity in the autophagy process of mitochondria that may play a protective role in inflammatory diseases. Subgroup III represented a high-risk subgroup with pathological processes including abnormal amyloid precursor protein activation, promotion of inflammatory response, and cell proliferation. 4Conclusion: The classification of the RA dataset revealed pathological heterogeneity among different subgroups, providing new insights and a basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms of RA, identifying potential therapeutic targets, and developing personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.