ArticleDigital health
Association between internet use and self-rated health of patients living with diabetes in the community.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: It is not clear whether self-rated health is associated with internet use among community-dwelling patients living with diabetes. This study investigated what kind and level of use of the internet is desirable for the subjective sense of health among patients living with diabetes in the community. Research Design and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of patients living with diabetes aged 18 years or older who visited our clinic between April 2022 and June 2022. The final analysis included 654 subjects (mean age: 56-90 years). The objective variable was self-rated health, and the explanatory variable was purpose of internet use. We used logistic regression analysis to identify odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between internet use and self-rated health by purpose of internet use. Results: Of the 654 patients living with diabetes using our clinic, 488 (64.7%) were internet users. Communication with friends/family (66.6%) was the most common use of the internet, followed by social media (54.3%) and shopping (36.7%). Logistic regression models showed that social media (OR: 1.81; 95% CI [1.02, 3.21], Conclusions: Using the internet for social media, shopping, and banking were found to be associated with self-rated health. Use for these purposes could help support diabetic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.