Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221269›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Metabolites profiling of Sapota fruit pulp

Mohamed A Farag, Nermin Ahmed Ragab, Maii Abdelnaby Ismail Maamoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed A FaragDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nermin Ahmed RagabDepartment of Pharmacognosy, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Maii Abdelnaby Ismail MaamounDepartment of Pharmacognosy, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sapota, Methods: The current study represents an integrated metabolites profiling of sapota fruits pulp Results: GC/MS analysis of silylated primary polar metabolites led to the identification of 68 compounds belonging to sugars (74%), sugar acids (18.27%), and sugar alcohols (7%) mediating the fruit sweetness. Headspace SPME-GC/MS analysis led to the detection of 17 volatile compounds belonging to nitrogenous compounds (72%), ethers (7.8%), terpenes (7.6%), and aldehydes (5.8%). Non-polar metabolites profiling by HR-UPLC/MS/MS-based Global Natural Products Social (GNPS) molecular networking led to the assignment of 31 peaks, with several novel sphingolipids and fatty acyl amides reported for the first time. Total phenolic content was estimated at 6.79 ± 0.12 mg gallic acid equivalent/gram extract (GAE/g extract), but no flavonoids were detected. The antioxidant capacities of fruit were at 1.62 ± 0.2, 1.49 ± 0.11, and 3.58 ± 0.14 mg Trolox equivalent/gram extract (TE/g extract)

Indexed as

AntioxidantsFruitLipasealpha-GlucosidasesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEnzyme InhibitorsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGlycoside Hydrolase InhibitorsPlant ExtractsTandem Mass Spectrometryalpha-GlucosidasesAntioxidantsEnzyme InhibitorsGlycoside Hydrolase InhibitorsLipasePlant ExtractsAntioxidantGNPS molecular networkingLipase inhibitorManilkara zapota L.SPME-GC/MSUPLC/MS

Identifiers

PMID39221269
PMCPMC11366232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.