ReviewCureus2024
Enhancing Healthcare Accountability for Administrators: Fostering Transparency for Patient Safety and Quality Enhancement.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causes and Consequences of Lack of Transparency In Iran's Healthcare System: A Qualitative Interview Study.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
- Systematic biocompatibility assessment of 4-µm surface silicone implants.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2026Article
- Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Academic Integrity and Cheating in Dental Education: Prevalence, Drivers, and Career Implications.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Nurses' perspectives on the effectiveness of mobile X-ray services in RACFs. a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The mediating role of risk perception in the relationship between chemical safety knowledge, GHS awareness and safety behavior.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ethical Principles in Medical Error Disclosure: From Harm to Healing in Clinical Practice.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward nutritional deficiencies in celiac disease among medical students and healthcare providers in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of interaction dynamics and professional capacity and development on cognitive medical errors: a multiple-case study of healthcare professionals in Jordan.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Unveiling the shadows: obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025Review
- Forensic psychiatric care professionals' experiences of communicating with foreign patients and their relatives: the importance of language and culture.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Entrepreneurial Leadership and Patient Loyalty in Indonesian Hospitals: The Roles of Corporate Governance, Service Quality, and Patient Satisfaction.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Reconceptualizing the balanced scorecard as a communication mechanism in healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Barriers to medication administration error reporting in a tertiary hospital in Lebanon.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transparency in healthcare organizations is essential for creating a culture of patient-centered care where patients are respected, informed, and actively engaged in their health and well-being. Organizational transparency is a crucial element in healthcare, enhancing patient safety and quality improvement. Transparency involves open communication about healthcare organizations' performance, outcomes, and processes, leading to improved accountability, trust, and patient engagement. Transparent organizations prioritize patient-centered care, involving patients in decision-making and fostering shared mental models between healthcare providers and patients. Psychological safety is vital for organizational transparency. Patient safety reporting systems play a key role in transparency, allowing anonymous reporting of safety concerns and incidents. These systems facilitate early risk identification, continuous improvement, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Transparency in reporting encourages a culture of openness, learning from near misses, and addressing systemic issues and human errors. It aligns with ethical principles, potentially mitigating legal challenges. This review synthesizes key themes, including the importance of patient-centered care, the role of psychological safety in fostering transparency, and the effectiveness of patient safety reporting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.