ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2024
Progress towards understanding risk factor mechanisms in the development of autism spectrum disorders.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disruption of FOXG1 Impairs the Development of Striatal dSPNs, Thereby Contributing to ASD-Like Phenotypes.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Asymmetric neural dynamics of visuospatial attention in autism spectrum disorder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Potential glutamatergic and GABAergic false neurotransmitters in models of excitation-inhibition imbalance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Testing the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to 40-Hz and 27-Hz click trains in children with autism spectrum disorder and their first-degree biological relatives: A high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Autism risk variants inmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a heterogenous set of syndromes characterised by social impairment and cognitive symptoms. Currently, there are limited treatment options available to help people with ASD manage their symptoms. Understanding the biological mechanisms that result in ASD diagnosis and symptomatology is an essential step in developing new interventional strategies. Human genetic studies have identified common gene variants of small effect and rare risk genes and copy number variants (CNVs) that substantially increase the risk of developing ASD. Reverse translational studies using rodent models based on these genetic variants provide new insight into the biological basis of ASD. Here we review recent findings from three ASD associated CNV mouse models (16p11.2, 2p16.3 and 22q11.2 deletion) that show behavioural and cognitive phenotypes relevant to ASD. These models have identified disturbed excitation-inhibition neurotransmitter balance, evidenced by dysfunctional glutamate and GABA signalling, as a key aetiological mechanism. These models also provide emerging evidence for serotoninergic neurotransmitter system dysfunction, although more work is needed to clarify the nature of this. At the brain network level, prefrontal cortex (PFC) dysfunctional connectivity is also evident across these models, supporting disturbed PFC function as a key nexus in ASD aetiology. Overall, published data highlight the utility and valuable insight gained into ASD aetiology from preclinical CNV mouse models. These have identified key aetiological mechanisms that represent putative novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of ASD symptoms, making them useful translational models for future drug discovery, development and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.