SynthesisEuropean heart journal2024
Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation with or without vascular disease: a combined analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials.
Synthesis in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07713615 (Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation - Haemostatic Profile and Echocardiographic Variables), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation - Haemostatic Profile and Echocardiographic Variables
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of anticoagulation in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation and multiple stroke risk factors: a win ratio analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 trial.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of apixaban vs. aspirin for the reduction of thrombo-embolism in high-risk patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARTESiA trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Practical Recommendations for Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- [What to do with device-detected atrial fibrillation? : Executive summary of the position paper of the German Society of Cardiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Review
- Subclinical atrial fibrillation: Implications of recent trials for guideline updates?World journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Irregular atrial arrhythmias shorter than 30 s and the risk of atrial fibrillation on continuous monitoring.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Device-detected Atrial Fibrillation: How Much is Too Much?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial high-rate episodes.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- From Detection to Decision: Managing Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) scientific statement on stroke prevention strategies in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation: the 4S-DDAF approach.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Apixaban in subclinical atrial fibrillation: stroke-driven value amid economic uncertainty.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention of atrial fibrillation patients: can we rely on them in all clinical scenarios?Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Refining Stroke Risk Assessment in Patients with Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is unknown. Concomitant vascular disease can modify the benefits and risks of anticoagulation.
methodsThese pre-specified analyses of the NOAH-AFNET 6 (n = 2534 patients) and ARTESiA (n = 4012 patients) trials compared anticoagulation with no anticoagulation in patients with DDAF with or without vascular disease, defined as prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack, coronary or peripheral artery disease. Efficacy outcomes were the primary outcomes of both trials, a composite of stroke, systemic arterial embolism (SE), myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism or cardiovascular death, and stroke or SE. Safety outcomes were major bleeding or major bleeding and death.
resultsIn patients with vascular disease (NOAH-AFNET 6, 56%; ARTESiA, 46%), stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic or pulmonary embolism, or cardiovascular death occurred at 3.9%/patient-year with and 5.0%/patient-year without anticoagulation (NOAH-AFNET 6), and 3.2%/patient-year with and 4.4%/patient-year without anticoagulation (ARTESiA). Without vascular disease, outcomes were equal with and without anticoagulation (NOAH-AFNET 6, 2.7%/patient-year; ARTESiA, 2.3%/patient-year in both randomized groups). Meta-analysis found consistent results across both trials (I2heterogeneity = 6%) with a trend for interaction with randomized therapy (pinteraction = .08). Stroke/SE behaved similarly. Anticoagulation equally increased major bleeding in vascular disease patients [edoxaban, 2.1%/patient-year; no anticoagulation, 1.3%/patient-year; apixaban, 1.7%/patient-years; no anticoagulation, 1.1%/patient-year; incidence rate ratio 1.55 (1.10-2.20)] and without vascular disease [edoxaban, 2.2%/patient-year; no anticoagulation, 0.6%/patient-year; apixaban, 1.4%/patient-year; no anticoagulation, 1.1%/patient-year; incidence rate ratio 1.93 (0.72-5.20)].
conclusionsPatients with DDAF and vascular disease are at higher risk of stroke and cardiovascular events and may derive a greater benefit from anticoagulation than patients with DDAF without vascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.