ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Ultra-low-impact laparoscopy: a new concept for a minimally invasive surgery.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of open ovariectomy with sutures or bipolar vessel sealing versus laparoscopic approach in cats.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMinimally invasive surgery is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gynecological diseases. Our study aims to assess the effectiveness of the new concept of ultra-low-impact laparoscopy as a combination of low-impact laparoscopy, consisting in the use of miniaturized instruments through 3-5mm ports and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, with regional anesthesia to evaluate the perioperative outcomes.
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed from May 2023 to December 2023, to enroll 26 women affected by benign gynecological disease and threated by mini-invasive surgical approach. The surgical procedures were performed following the low-impact laparoscopy protocol and the regional anesthesia protocol. The postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting and the antiemetic/analgesic intake were evaluated. Postoperative surgical and anesthesiological variables were analyzed.
resultsOperative time was within 90 min (41.1 ± 17.1 mean ± standard deviation (SD)) and no conversion to laparotomy or general anesthesia was required. According to VAS score, the postoperative pain during the whole observation time was less than 3 (mean). Faster resumption of bowel motility (6.5 ± 2.1 mean ± SD) and women's mobilization (3.1 ± 0.7 mean ± SD) were observed as well as low incidence of post-operative nausea and vomit. Early discharge and patient's approval were recorded. Intraoperatively pain score was assessed on Likert scale during all stages.
conclusionUltra-low-impact laparoscopy showed to provide a satisfying recovery experience for patients in terms of short hospital stays, cosmetic result, and pain relief, without compromising surgical outcomes. The encouraging results lead us to recruit a greater number of patients to validate our technique as a future well-established produce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39222086What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.