Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223143›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Green spaces provide substantial but unequal urban cooling globally.

Yuxiang Li, Jens-Christian Svenning, Weiqi Zhou, Kai Zhu, Jesse F Abrams, Timothy M Lenton, William J Ripple, Zhaowu Yu, Shuqing N Teng, Robert R Dunn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Redlining, Urban Heat, and Climate Hazards: Impacts on Children's Cardiometabolic Health.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ten new insights in climate science 2024.One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuxiang LiSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jens-Christian SvenningCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-0862
Weiqi ZhouState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-4906
Kai ZhuSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-3317
Jesse F AbramsGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-8519
Timothy M LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-7498
William J RippleDepartment of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Zhaowu YuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4541
Shuqing N TengSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. shuqingteng@nju.edu.cn.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. rrdunn@ncsu.edu.
Chi XuSchool of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. xuchi@nju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-9032

Funding

Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Foundation) DNRF173National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32061143014Open Society Foundations OR2021-82956Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 16549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate warming disproportionately impacts countries in the Global South by increasing extreme heat exposure. However, geographic disparities in adaptation capacity are unclear. Here, we assess global inequality in green spaces, which urban residents critically rely on to mitigate outdoor heat stress. We use remote sensing data to quantify daytime cooling by urban greenery in the warm seasons across the ~500 largest cities globally. We show a striking contrast, with Global South cities having ~70% of the cooling capacity of cities in the Global North (2.5 ± 1.0 °C vs. 3.6 ± 1.7 °C). A similar gap occurs for the cooling adaptation benefits received by an average resident in these cities (2.2 ± 0.9 °C vs. 3.4 ± 1.7 °C). This cooling adaptation inequality is due to discrepancies in green space quantity and quality between cities in the Global North and South, shaped by socioeconomic and natural factors. Our analyses further suggest a vast potential for enhancing cooling adaptation while reducing global inequality.

Identifiers

PMID39223143
PMCPMC11369290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.