Evidence mapPaperPMID 39223235Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

Gut microbiome and schizophrenia: insights from two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Keer Zhou, Ancha Baranova, Hongbao Cao, Jing Sun, Fuquan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keer ZhouDepartment of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ancha BaranovaSchool of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Hongbao CaoSchool of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Jing SunDepartment of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. jingsun2007@163.com.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. zfqeee@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-8191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests a potential link between the gut microbiome and schizophrenia. However, it is unclear whether the gut microbiome is causally associated with schizophrenia. We performed two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization to detect bidirectional causal relationships between gut microbiome and schizophrenia. Summary genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets of the gut microbiome from the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340) and schizophrenia (n = 130,644) were utilized in our study. Then a cohort of sensitive analyses was followed to validate the robustness of MR results. We identified nine taxa that exerted positive causal effects on schizophrenia (OR: 1.08-1.16) and six taxa that conferred negative causal effects on schizophrenia (OR: 0.88-0.94). On the other hand, the reverse MR analysis showed that schizophrenia may increase the abundance of nine taxa (OR: 1.03-1.08) and reduce the abundance of two taxa (OR: 0.94). Our study unveiled mutual causal relationships between gut microbiome and schizophrenia. The findings may provide evidence for the treatment potential of gut microbiomes in schizophrenia.

Identifiers

PMID39223235
PMCPMC11369294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.