ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimization of the convolutional neural network classification model under the background of innovative art teaching models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve students' ability to recognize and appreciate artworks, and further enhance their academic performance and classroom satisfaction, this study explores the application of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model based on optimization in art teaching. Firstly, the importance and challenges of art teaching are analyzed. Secondly, the principle and structure of CNN and its application in the classification field are expounded, and then the CNN classification model is optimized. Finally, the effectiveness of the optimized model is verified by experiments. Experimental results show that the optimized model's accuracy is up to 95.2% in the performance evaluation. The training time of the optimized model is much lower than that of the traditional model, and this model still maintains 95.2% accuracy under the noise of 14.7%. In addition, the accuracy of the optimized model on the unseen test data is 92%. In comparing teaching experiment results, by introducing the CNN classification model, Class B students' average score of art homework has increased by 4.3 points. The score for class satisfaction is 8.1 points. This indicates that the optimized CNN model has significant advantages in art teaching and can effectively improve students' classroom satisfaction and academic performance. Therefore, this study has specific reference significance for the innovation of the art teaching model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.