Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223429›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2024

Microproteins unveiling new dimensions in cancer.

S Daisy Precilla, Indrani Biswas, T S Anitha, B Agieshkumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Miniprotein inhibitors of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Daisy PrecillaMahatma Gandhi Medical Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, 607 402, India. daisyprecilla@mgmari.sbvu.ac.in.
Indrani BiswasMahatma Gandhi Medical Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, 607 402, India.
T S AnithaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014, India.
B AgieshkumarMahatma Gandhi Medical Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, 607 402, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the complex landscape of cancer biology, the discovery of microproteins has triggered a paradigm shift, thereby, challenging the conventional conceptions of gene regulation. Though overlooked for years, these entities encoded by the small open reading frames (100-150 codons), have a significant impact on various cellular processes. As precision medicine pioneers delve deeper into the genome and proteome, microproteins have come into the limelight. Typically characterized by a single protein domain that directly binds to the target protein complex and regulates their assembly, these microproteins have been shown to play a key role in fundamental biological processes such as RNA processing, DNA repair, and metabolism regulation. Techniques for identification and characterization, such as ribosome profiling and proteogenomic approaches, have unraveled unique mechanisms by which these microproteins regulate cell signaling or pathological processes in most diseases including cancer. However, the functional relevance of these microproteins in cancer remains unclear. In this context, the current review aims to "rethink the essence of these genes" and explore "how these hidden players-microproteins orchestrate the signaling cascades of cancer, both as accelerators and brakes.".

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMicropeptidesOpen Reading FramesRibosomesSignal TransductionMicropeptidesApoptosisCancerMicroproteinsSignaling pathwaysSmall open reading frames

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.