Evidence mapPaperPMID 39223443Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Pharmacist E-script transcription service initiated nicotine replacement therapy uptake in pre-admission clinic: A pilot study.

Darshana Meanger, Ashley Webb, Iouri Banakh, Lisa Coward, Gael Cripps, Johnson George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pharmacist E-script transcription service initiated nicotine replacement therapy uptake in pre-admission clinic: A pilot study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darshana MeangerPeninsula Health Pharmacy Department and Eastern Health Pharmacy Department, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1172-5973
Ashley WebbPeninsula Health Anaesthetics Department, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-158X
Iouri BanakhMonash Health Pharmacy Department, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Australia.
Lisa CowardPeninsula Health Anaesthetics Department, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Australia.
Gael CrippsPeninsula Health Preadmission Clinic, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Australia.
Johnson GeorgeCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacist-led smoking cessation programs in pre-admission clinics (PAC) have shown to increase quit attempts and achieve abstinence by the day of surgery (DOS).

aimsTo evaluate the feasibility of Pharmacist E-script Transcription Service (PETS) initiated nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in PAC, including smoking cessation on DOS.

methodsA single centre, pre and post-intervention pilot study conducted at an Australian public hospital PAC. In a two-month intervention period, PAC nursing staff invited smokers (≥1 cigarette/day) to see a smoking cessation PET pharmacist. Pharmacist-initiated NRT and Quitline© referrals were offered. Cessation outcomes were compared with the preceding two-month control period. PRIMARY OUTCOME: feasibility of intervention. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: DOS smoking abstinence rates and three-months post-surgery.

resultsPAC nurses identified 112 smokers over 4 months; 53 during pre-intervention period, and 59 during intervention period. Twenty-two intervention patients (37%) accepted seeing the pharmacist, with 16 subsequent Quitline© referrals (73%) and 11 NRT prescriptions (50%) written. The median nursing smoking status documentation time increased in the intervention period (1 min vs. 4, p < .001). The intervention did not impact pharmacist's workload. Verified abstinence increased from 8.5% (4/47) pre-intervention to 9.4% (5/53) post-intervention, p =1.00. Relapse rates in the intervention period increased (20% vs. 50%) at three-months post-surgery.

conclusionA PETS-initiated NRT program in PAC is feasible and increased preoperative use of NRT and Quitline© with minimal impact on smoking cessation. SO WHAT?: This study has highlighted the importance of implementing a multidisciplinary smoking cessation program in PAC however, larger studies are needed to determine the true impact of the program on smoking cessations.

Indexed as

PharmacistsSmoking CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotine Replacement TherapyPilot Projectsabstinencenicotine replacementpharmacistpre‐admission clinicsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID39223443
PMCPMC11730269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.