Evidence mapPaperPMID 39223591Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2024

Sex specific analysis of patients with and without reported statin intolerance referred to a specialized outpatient lipid clinic.

Maximilian A Muck, Marcus Fischer, Michael Hamerle, Christina Strack, Maxime Holzhaeuer, Dennis Pfeffer, Ute Hubauer, Lars S Maier, Andrea Baessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maximilian A MuckKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Marcus FischerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael HamerleKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christina StrackKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Maxime HolzhaeuerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Dennis PfefferKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ute HubauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lars S MaierKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andrea BaesslerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 2, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. andrea.baessler@ukr.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7561-1007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLowering LDL-cholesterol is a fundamental goal for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Our study aims to analyse potential sex disparities regarding the tolerability and effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with and without reported statin intolerance who are being treated at a lipid-outpatient clinic.

methodsFrom 2017 to 2022, n = 1062 patients (n = 612 men, n = 450 women) at high-risk were referred to our lipid-outpatient clinic because of difficulties in lipid control by primary healthcare providers. The main therapeutic objective was to optimize lipid-lowering therapy according to current treatment guidelines.

resultsPatients presented with high LDL-C baseline levels (4.97 ± 1.81 mmol/l (192 ± 70 mg/dL) in men and 5.46 ± 2.04 mmol/l (211 ± 79 mg/dL) in women). Intolerance towards statins was reported more frequently by women (48.2%) than by men (38.9%, p = 0.004). LDL-C continuously decreased with individual treatment adjustments across follow-up visits. In total, treatment goals (LDL < 1.4 mmol/l (< 55 mg/dl) or < 1.8 mmol/l (< 70 mg/dl)) were accomplished in 75.8% of men and 55.5% of women after the last follow-up visit (p < 0.0001). In men, these data are almost identical in subjects with statin intolerance. In contrast, treatment goals were reached less frequently in women with statin intolerance compared to women tolerant to statin therapy.

conclusionEven if treated in a specialized lipid clinic, women are less likely to reach their target LDL-C than men, particularly when statin intolerant. Nevertheless, many patients with statin intolerance can be successfully treated using oral combination and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy. However, ongoing follow-up care to monitor progress and to adjust treatment plans is necessary to reach this goal.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSex CharacteristicsAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolaemiaLDL cholesterol goal attainmentLipid lowering drugsSex and genderStatin intolerance

Identifiers

PMID39223591
PMCPMC11367976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.