Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224251›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Exploring the mechanism of action of

Sucheesmita Padhee, Debajani Mohanty, Ambika Sahoo, Sudipta Jena, Pratap Chandra Panda, Asit Ray, Sanghamitra Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sucheesmita PadheeCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Debajani MohantyCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Ambika SahooCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sudipta JenaCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Pratap Chandra PandaCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Asit RayCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanghamitra NayakCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study employed a comprehensive approach of network pharmacology, molecular dynamic simulation and

Indexed as

MD simulationMolecular dockingNetwork pharmacologyOsteoarthritisVanda tessellata extract

Identifiers

PMID39224251
PMCPMC11367146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.