Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224361›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Artificial intelligence algorithms permits rapid acute kidney injury risk classification of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Jun Wei, Dabei Cai, Tingting Xiao, Qianwen Chen, Wenwu Zhu, Qingqing Gu, Yu Wang, Qingjie Wang, Xin Chen, Shenglin Ge and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jun WeiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Dabei CaiDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Tingting XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Qianwen ChenDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Wenwu ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Xuzhou, 221006, Jiangsu, China.
Qingqing GuDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Qingjie WangDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Shenglin GeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ling SunDepartment of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate several artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients at an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. Methods: Included were patients diagnosed with AMI from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III and IV databases. Two cohorts of AMI patients from Changzhou Second People's Hospital and Xuzhou Center Hospital were used for external validation of the models. Patients' demographics, vital signs, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and therapeutic measures were extracted. Totally, 12 AI models were developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated and compared. Results: AKI occurred during hospitalization in 1098 (28.3 %) of the 3882 final enrolled patients, split into training (3105) and test (777) sets randomly. Among them, Random Forest (RF), C5.0 and Bagged CART models outperformed the other models in both the training and test sets. The AUCs for the test set were 0.754, 0.734 and 0.730, respectively. The incidence of AKI was 9.8 % and 9.5 % in 2202 patients in the Changzhou cohort and 807 patients in the Xuzhou cohort with AMI, respectively. The AUCs for patients in the Changzhou cohort were RF, 0.761; C5.0, 0.733; and bagged CART, 0.725, respectively, and Xuzhou cohort were RF, 0.799; C5.0, 0.808; and bagged CART, 0.784, respectively. Conclusion: Several machines learning-based prediction models for AKI after AMI were developed and validated. The RF, C5.0 and Bagged CART model performed robustly in identifying high-risk patients earlier. Clinical trial approval statement: This Trial was registered in the Chinese clinical trials registry: ChiCTR1800014583. Registered January 22, 2018 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx).

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAcute myocardial infarctionArtificial intelligenceRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39224361
PMCPMC11367145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.