ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2024
A few-shot learning framework for the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis using knee X-ray images.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- MultiScaleKANNet: a hybrid CNN-KAN-transformer architecture for radiographic bone-loss risk stratification from knee X-rays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An AI-based pipeline for osteoporosis/osteopenia prediction using hip radiographs.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Current Status of AI-Assisted Screening for Opportunistic Osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- Prevention of Osteoporosis in SAMP6 Mice by Rikkunshi-To: Japanese Kampo Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of IBEX Bone Health for assessment of osteoporosis from knee radiographs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- A new superfluity deep learning model for detecting knee osteoporosis and osteopenia in X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe developed a few-shot learning (FSL) framework for the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis in knee X-ray images.
methodsComputer vision models containing deep convolutional neural networks were fine-tuned to enable generalization from natural images (ImageNet) to chest X-ray images (normal vs. pneumonia, base images). Then, a series of automated machine learning classifiers based on the Euclidean distances of base images were developed to make predictions for novel images (normal vs. osteopenia vs. osteoporosis). The performance of the FSL framework was compared with that of junior and senior radiologists. In addition, the gradient-weighted class activation mapping algorithm was used for visual interpretation.
resultsIn Cohort #1, the mean accuracy (0.728) and sensitivity (0.774) of the FSL models were higher than those of the radiologists (0.512 and 0.448). A diagnostic pipeline of FSL model (first)-radiologists (second) achieved better performance (0.653 accuracy, 0.582 sensitivity, and 0.816 specificity) than radiologists alone. In Cohort #2, the diagnostic pipeline also showed improved performance.
conclusionsThe FSL framework yielded practical performance with respect to the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis in comparison with radiologists. This retrospective study supports the use of promising FSL methods in computer-aided diagnosis tasks involving limited samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.