ArticleAging and disease2024
EchoAGE: Echocardiography-based Neural Network Model Forecasting Heart Biological Age.
Article in Aging and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological aging clocks in health and disease.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- The Evolving Landscape of Clinical Aging Clocks: From Epigenetic to Multi-Omics Integration.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Blood biochemical and gut microbiotic neural network models forecasting human biological age.Aging · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Aging-Related Diseases: Accelerated Aging, Molecular Mechanisms, Interventions, and Therapies.Aging and disease · 2025Article
- Transcriptome-Wide Insights: Neonatal Lactose Intolerance Promotes Telomere Damage, Senescence, and Cardiomyopathy in Adult Rat Heart.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Critical review of aging clocks and factors that may influence the pace of aging.Frontiers in aging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological age is a personalized measure of the health status of an organism, organ, or system, as opposed to simply accounting for chronological age. To date, there have been known attempts to create estimators of biological age based on various biomedical data. In this work, we focused on developing an approach for assessing heart biological age using echocardiographic data. The current study included echocardiographic data from more than 5,000 different cases. As a result, we created EchoAGE - neural network model to determine heart biological age, that was tested on echocardiographic data from patients with age-related diseases, patients with multimorbidity, children with progeria syndrome, and diachronic data series. The model estimates biological age with a Mean Absolute Error of approximately 3.5 years, an R-squared value of around 0.88, and a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient greater than 0.9 in men and women. EchoAGE uses indicators such as E/A ratio of maximum flow rates in the first and second phases, thicknesses of the interventricular septum and the posterior left ventricular wall, cardiac output, and relative wall thickness. In addition, we have applied an AI explanation algorithm to improve understanding of how the model performs an assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.