Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226276›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Assessing compliance with national guidelines in diabetes care: A study leveraging data from south Africa's National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS).

A T Brennan, E M Kileel, M P Fox, J A George, S Khoza, S Rosen, F Raal, P Hibberd, K Chetty, K Mlisana and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A T BrennanFaculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-0668
E M KileelDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-2035
M P FoxFaculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J A GeorgeWits Diagnostic Innovation Hub, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S KhozaNational Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-7460
S RosenFaculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-2964
F RaalFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-7938
P HibberdDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
K ChettyNational Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
K MlisanaNational Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
J BorFaculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5112-8536
N J CrowtherNational Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-1745

Funding

Evidence of the burden of diabetes, gaps in the diabetes cascade-of-care and the impact of care and treatment on diabetes outcomes in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in South AfricaK01DK116929 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BRENNAN, ALANA TERESA · 2019 to 2023
$866k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a major global health issue. We evaluated compliance to laboratory-based management guidelines for diabetes (type 1 and 2), essential for effective treatment and reducing diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. Our study utilized South Africa's National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) data, focusing on patients from birth to age 80 years who underwent initial diabetes laboratory testing between January 1, 2012-January 1, 2016. Patients were categorized into type 1 (<30 years) or type 2 (≥30-80 years) diabetes based on age at first diabetes test. National diabetes guidelines recommend blood glucose to be checked every three-six months post laboratory-diagnosis. We employed a sharp regression discontinuity design to estimate the effect of a laboratory-diagnosis of diabetes on the likelihood of having a follow-up laboratory test 24 months post-diagnosis. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, the probability of a diabetes follow-up laboratory test within 24 months was 52.4% for patients presenting above the diabetes diagnosis threshold vs 31.1% for those presenting below. Although the likelihood of repeat testing rose with higher HbA1c and glucose levels, at the diagnostic threshold there was no clinically meaningful difference (risk difference: -2.2%, 95% CI: -3.3%, -1.2%). These results were consistent among patients with type 1 diabetes, those living with and without HIV, and healthcare setting. In a national laboratory cohort, diabetes laboratory-diagnosis did not lead to increased monitoring as recommended in national guidelines. Strategies to improve patient education, healthcare provider communication, and healthcare system support are essential to enhance guideline compliance and overall diabetes management.

Identifiers

PMID39226276
PMCPMC11371240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.