Evidence mapPaperPMID 39227321Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2024

Impact of surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls: A pilot study.

Vlasta Bari, Francesca Gelpi, Beatrice Cairo, Martina Anguissola, Elena Acerbi, Mattia Squillace, Beatrice De Maria, Enrico Giuseppe Bertoldo, Valentina Fiolo, Edward Callus and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vlasta BariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-2677
Francesca GelpiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Beatrice CairoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Martina AnguissolaDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Elena AcerbiDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Mattia SquillaceDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Beatrice De MariaIRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Milan, Italy.
Enrico Giuseppe BertoldoClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Valentina FioloClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Edward CallusDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carlo De VincentiisDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BedogniDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Marco RanucciDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Alberto PortaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-9824

Funding

Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) RF-2016-02361069Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are options in severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular (CBV) control markers, derived from variability of heart period, systolic arterial pressure, mean cerebral blood velocity and mean arterial pressure, were acquired in 19 AVS patients (age: 76.8 ± 3.1 yrs, eight males) scheduled for SAVR and in 19 AVS patients (age: 79.9 + 6.5 yrs, 11 males) scheduled for TAVI before (PRE) and after intervention (POST, <7 days). Left ventricular function was preserved in both groups. Patients were studied at supine resting (REST) and during active standing (STAND). We found that: (i) both SAVR and TAVI groups featured a weak pre-procedure CV control; (ii) TAVI ensured better CV control; (iii) cerebral autoregulation was working in PRE in both SAVR and TAVI groups; (iv) SAVR and TAVI had no impact on the CBV control; (v) regardless of group, CV and CBV control markers were not influenced by STAND in POST. Even though the post-procedure preservation of both CV and CBV controls in TAVI group might lead to privilege this procedure in patients at higher risk, the missing response to STAND suggests that this advantage could be insignificant.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisCerebrovascular CirculationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveFemaleHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMalePilot Projectsactive standingaortic valve stenosisautonomic nervous systembaroreflexblood flowcerebral autoregulationheart rate variabilitymean arterial blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID39227321
PMCPMC11371460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.