Evidence mapPaperPMID 39227458Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025

Varying optimal power for height-standardisation of childhood weight, fat mass and fat-free mass across the obesity epidemic.

Mohammed T Hudda, Julie Aarestrup, Christopher G Owen, Jennifer L Baker, Peter H Whincup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Has the BMI had its day?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed T HuddaDepartment of Population Health, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait. mohammed.hudda@dasmaninstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-1159
Julie AarestrupCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher G OwenPopulation Health Research Institute, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Jennifer L BakerCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-6615
Peter H WhincupPopulation Health Research Institute, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildhood adiposity markers can be standardised for height in the form of indices (marker/height SETTING/

methodsPopulation-based cross-sectional study of 391,801 schoolchildren aged 7 years, 10 years and 13 years, born between 1930 and 1996, from the Copenhagen School Health Records Register. Sex- and age-specific estimates of the height powers for weight and FM were obtained using log-log regression, stratified by a decade of birth.

resultsFor weight, amongst children born 1930-39, optimal height powers at 7 years were 2.20 (95% CI: 2.19-2.22) for boys and 2.28 (95% CI: 2.26-2.30) for girls. These increased with birth year to 2.82 (95% CI: 2.76-2.87) and 2.92 (95% CI: 2.87-2.97) for boys and girls born in 1990-96, respectively. For FM, amongst those born 1930-39, powers at 7 years were 2.46 (95% CI: 2.42-2.51) and 2.58 (95% CI: 2.53-2.63) for boys and girls, respectively, and increased with birth year reaching 3.89 (95% CI: 3.75-4.02) and 3.93 (95% CI: 3.80-4.06) for boys and girls born 1990-96, respectively. Powers within birth cohort groups for weight and FM were higher at 10 years than at 7 years, though similar increases across groups were observed at both ages. At 13 years, height powers for weight and FM initially increased with the birth year before declining from the 1970s/80s.

conclusionDue to increases in the standard deviation of weight and FM during the obesity epidemic, optimal height powers needed to standardise childhood weight and FM varied by birth year, sex, and age. Adiposity indices using a uniform height power mean different things for different birth cohort groups, sexes, and ages thus should be interpreted with caution. Alternative methods to account for height in epidemiological analyses are needed.

Indexed as

AdiposityBody HeightBody WeightPediatric ObesityAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkEpidemicsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39227458
PMCPMC11682999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.