Evidence mapPaperPMID 39227924Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2024

Advances and counterpoints in type 2 diabetes. What is ready for translation into real-world practice, ahead of the guidelines.

Stanley S Schwartz, Barbara E Corkey, James R Gavin, Ralph A DeFronzo, Mary E Herman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stanley S SchwartzMain Line Health, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Barbara E CorkeyDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
James R GavinEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ralph A DeFronzoDepartment of Medicine, Diabetes Division, University of Texas Health Science Center, South Texas. Veterans Health Care System and Texas Diabetes Institute, 701 S. Zarzamoro, San Antonio, TX, 78207, USA.
Mary E HermanSocial Alchemy: Building Physician Competency Across the Globe, 5 Ave Sur #36, Antigua, Sacatepéquez, Guatemala. mariaon4@mail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review seeks to address major gaps and delays between our rapidly evolving body of knowledge on type 2 diabetes and its translation into real-world practice. Through updated and improved best practices informed by recent evidence and described herein, we stand to better attain A1c targets, help preserve beta cell integrity and moderate glycemic variability, minimize treatment-emergent hypoglycemia, circumvent prescribing to "treatment failure," and prevent long-term complications. The first topic addressed in this review concerns updates in the 2023 and 2024 diabetes treatment guidelines for which further elaboration can help facilitate integration into routine care. The second concerns advances in diabetes research that have not yet found their way into guidelines, though they are endorsed by strong evidence and are ready for real-world use in appropriate patients. The final theme addresses lingering misconceptions about the underpinnings of type 2 diabetes-fundamental fallacies that continue to be asserted in the textbooks and continuing medical education upon which physicians build their approaches. A corrected and up-to-date understanding of the disease state is essential for practitioners to both conceptually and translationally manage initial onset through late-stage type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Practice Guidelines as TopicGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsBeta cellsType 2 diabetesType 2 diabetes remission

Identifiers

PMID39227924
PMCPMC11373437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.