ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Natural Transposable Element Insertions Contribute to Host Fitness in Model Yeasts.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Evidence of Early-Diverging Domesticated Lineages in Norwegian Farmhouse Yeast.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Pseudogene revival drives repeated adaptation in fission yeast.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Transposable Element Evolution in Crustaceans.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitous in the eukaryote genomes, but their evolutionary and functional significance remains largely obscure and contentious. Here, we explore the evolution and functional impact of TEs in two model unicellular eukaryotes, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which diverged around 330 to 420 million years ago. We analyze the distribution of LTR retrotransposons (LTR-RTs, the only TE order identified in both species) and their solo-LTR derivatives in 35 strains of S. pombe and 128 strains of S. cerevisiae. We find that natural LTR-RT and solo-LTR insertions exhibit high presence-absence polymorphism among individuals in both species. Population genetics analyses show that solo-LTR insertions experienced functional constraints similar to synonymous sites of host genes in both species, indicating a majority of solo-LTR insertions might have evolved in a neutral manner. When knocking out nine representative solo-LTR insertions separately in the S. pombe strain 972h- and 12 representative solo-LTR insertions separately in the S. cerevisiae strain S288C, we find that one solo-LTR insertion in S. pombe has a significant effect on the fitness and transcriptome of its host. Together, our findings indicate that a fraction of natural TE insertions likely shape their host transcriptomes and thereby contribute to their host fitness, with implications for understanding the functional significance of TEs in eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.