Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39228468›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental advances2022

Toxicity by descent: A comparative approach for chemical hazard assessment.

John K Colbourne, Joseph R Shaw, Elena Sostare, Claudia Rivetti, Romain Derelle, Rosemary Barnett, Bruno Campos, Carlie LaLone, Mark R Viant, Geoff Hodges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid acceleratesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Conserved Molecular Responses to Arsenite Exposure inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic expression of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) proteome across early larval development.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part D, Genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A workflow for human health hazard evaluation using transcriptomic data and Key Characteristics-based gene sets.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Medical science pulse · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Utilizing Omics Data for Chemical Grouping.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John K ColbourneMichabo Health Science Ltd, Coventry CV1 2NT, UK.
Joseph R ShawO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.
Elena SostareMichabo Health Science Ltd, Coventry CV1 2NT, UK.
Claudia RivettiSafety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Romain DerelleSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Rosemary BarnettMichabo Health Science Ltd, Coventry CV1 2NT, UK.
Bruno CamposSafety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Carlie LaLoneUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth 55804, USA.
Mark R ViantMichabo Health Science Ltd, Coventry CV1 2NT, UK.
Geoff HodgesSafety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicology is traditionally divided between human and eco-toxicology. In the shared pursuit of environmental health, this separation does not account for discoveries made in the comparative studies of animal genomes. Here, we provide evidence on the feasibility of understanding the health impact of chemicals on all animals, including ecological keystone species and humans, based on a significant number of conserved genes and their functional associations to health-related outcomes across much of animal diversity. We test four conditions to understand the value of comparative genomics data to inform mechanism-based human and environmental hazard assessment:

Indexed as

BiomarkersComparative toxicologyCross-species extrapolationEvolutionary toxicologyGenomicsModel species

Identifiers

PMID39228468
PMCPMC11370884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.